The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI06LA074 · Final report

Bell 206L-1 accident near Chesterfield, Indiana, February 2, 2006

On February 2, 2006 at about 6:43 am local time, a Bell 206L-1 (helicopter), registered N593AE, was destroyed in an accident near Chesterfield, Indiana (Anderson Municipal Airport). It was a positioning flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 3 people were seriously injured. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control after becoming spatially disorientated shortly after departure. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadequate preflight weather evaluation, his inadvertent flight into night instrument meteorological conditions, and the ground objects that the helicopter impacted during the descent.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
February 2, 2006 · about 6:43 am local time
Place
Chesterfield, Indiana · Anderson Municipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
3 people were seriously injured.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Bell 206L-1 · all 206L-1s on the register
Registration
N593AE · no longer on the register · serial 45421
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Positioning flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The emergency medical service (EMS) flight was dispatched at night to pickup a patient from a hospital. The pilot reported that after receiving the dispatch orders he went outside to assess the current weather conditions, which he described as being a "little hazy." The pilot then obtained the local weather radar depiction and surface weather conditions. The pilot determined the weather at the departure and destination was suitable for visual flight rules (VFR) operations. The pilot did not listen to the airport's automated weather observing system (AWOS) broadcast before departure. The helicopter departed and almost immediately entered instrument meteorological conditions. He elected to terminate the flight and began a right turn back toward the departure airport. The pilot stated that he had difficultly maintaining level flight and felt that the helicopter was climbing slightly during the turn. He thought the attitude indicator was giving a false indication because it was not moving and was "cocked off center about 30 degrees." The pilot verified that the circuit breaker for the attitude indicator was not tripped. He saw some ground lighting to the left of the helicopter and started a left turn toward the lights. The pilot remembered seeing two houses before impact and attempted to steer the helicopter between them. Global positioning system (GPS) data showed the helicopter departing to the north, and then it made a climbing right turn, followed by a climbing left turn. The helicopter's maximum recorded altitude during the left turn was about 1,035 feet above ground level (agl). The helicopter impacted two pine trees, utility lines, a residential structure, a tree, and a garage before coming to a stop. The helicopter traveled about 325 feet from the initial contact with the two pine trees to its final position. The local weather conditions were continually broadcast and accessible using a telephone or radio. About one hour before the accident, the airport's AWOS indicated that the sky was overcast at 400 feet agl and the surface visibility was 3 sm with mist. About two minutes after the accident, the airport's AWOS indicated that the sky was overcast at 400 feet agl and the ground visibility was 2 1/2 sm. During the accident flight, the helicopter was operating in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). The pilot held an instrument rating, but the accident helicopter was not certified for flight in IMC. According to company documentation, the pilot had logged 26 hours of instrument experience since being hired in 1989. He had flown 13 hours during the prior 90 days, none of which were in IMC. The attitude indicator was bench-tested and no discrepancies were noted with its operation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 5,865 hours in all; 1,369 in this make and model; 13 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 4,814 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: August 1, 2005
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 13,433 hours
  • Last inspection: approved inspection programme, February 1, 2006
  • Maximum gross weight: 4,150 lb
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Allison 250-C30P (turboshaft); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: AID Anderson IN at 6:39 am
  • Destination: Kokomo IN

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Visibility: 2.5 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 400 ft
  • Temperature: 36°F (2°C), dew point 36°F (2°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.78 inHg
  • Observation at 6:45 am from AID, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.