Boeing 747-132 accident near Lake Michigan, October 21, 2004

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The Boeing 747-132, operated as an unscheduled domestic cargo flight under 14 CFR Part 121, was climbing through 15,000 feet mean sea level when the number one engine separated from its forward and aft engine mounts resulting in substantial damage to the airplane. The flight diverted to an alternate airport where it landed without further incident. Examination of the engine revealed an uncontained separation of an approximately 180-degree arc of the second stage turbine disk rim. The missing section of the rim coincided with circumferential rub marks on the second stage turbine disk that corresponded to rub marks on the rear inner rails of the second stage turbine vanes. The rubbed areas of the disk and vanes did not exhibit heat cracking consistent with a relatively long time period of rubbing relative to a sudden disk-to-vane contact. The fan rotor bearing did not exhibit rotational distress. The engine did not exhibit any evidence of a blade separation, case rupture, or any other uncontainment. The second stage retaining bolts are coated with a baked-on antiseize compound, FelPro C-200, during manufacture. Metallurgical exam of the second stage turbine bolts revealed cracking in the head-to-shank fillet radius and the presence of silver consistent with Silver Goop. Silver Goop is an anti-seize compound not authorized by the engine manufacturer for use in the high-pressure turbine area but is authorized in the low-pressure compressor area due to the catalytic properties of silver with wet FelPro C-200 resulting in a corrosive mixture that can contribute to bolt fractures. The induced loads from the second stage disk rim separation were estimated to have been 3.6 - 6.6 times greater than to those induced by a fan blade separation. The accident operator purchased an engine as-is and that according to maintenance records was not preserved when it was removed from an airplane belonging to another operator about 5 years prior to the accident. The high-pressure turbine (HPT) module was removed from this engine and installed on one of the accident operator's other engines prior to it being removed and then installed on the accident airplane engine. The accident operator's examination of the HPT was limited to a visual inspection that would not have detected a vane shift or ascertained the integrity second stage turbine vane assembly.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.