The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CHI03LA223 · Final report

Cessna 172H accident near Red Wing, Minnesota, July 24, 2003

On July 24, 2003 at about 4:10 pm local time, a Cessna 172H, registered N8226L, was substantially damaged in an accident near Red Wing, Minnesota (Red Wing Muni airport). It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to follow the checklist resulting in fuel starvation and subsequent loss of engine power.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 24, 2003 · about 4:10 pm local time
Place
Red Wing, Minnesota · Red Wing Muni · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 172H · all 172Hs on the register
Registration
N8226L · no longer on the register · serial 17256426
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airplane sustained substantial damage on impact with a localizer antenna and terrain during a forced landing following an in-flight loss of engine power on initial climb. An examination of the wreckage revealed that the fuel selector valve handle was set to the right fuel tank. The right fuel tank was empty. The left fuel tank contained about five gallons of fuel. There was no sign of a fuel spill at the scene. The engine produced a thumb compression at all cylinders. Both magnetos sparked. Removed spark plugs exhibited a light gray color. The engine was not test run. The student pilot reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions during the flight. A checklist from the airplane stated, "BEFORE TAKE OFF ... Fuel Selector Valve Handle - BOTH."

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 36 hours in all; 36 in this make and model; 16 in the last 90 days; 9 in the last 30 days; 8 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (valid medical--w/ waivers/lim.)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 1, 2002; 157 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,400 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Continental O-300 (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: RGK Red Wing MN at 3:30 pm
  • Destination: RGK Red Wing MN
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 9, 5,010 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 210° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: scat at 4,600 ft
  • Temperature: 75°F (24°C), dew point 57°F (14°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.06 inHg
  • Observation at 4:15 pm from RGK, 1 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Other NTSB records under N8226L the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1993-01-16ATL93LA053 · accident near Palmetto, GA · substantial damage · no injuries

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.