The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN25LA069 · Final report

Cirrus Design CORP SF50 accident near Spearfish, South Dakota, January 4, 2025

On January 4, 2025 at about 6:38 am local time, a 2018 Cirrus Design CORP SF50, registered N603AP, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing (flare/touchdown) near Spearfish, South Dakota (Black Hills Airport-Clyde Ice). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 6 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s failure to land on the centerline of the snow-covered runway at night, which resulted in the left wing impacting a snowbank, a subsequent loss of directional control, and runway excursion.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 4, 2025 · about 6:38 am local time
Place
Spearfish, South Dakota · Black Hills Airport-Clyde Ice · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 6 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cirrus Design CORP SF50, built 2018
Registration
N603AP · registry record · serial 0057
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported the flight proceeded uneventfully until landing. The air traffic controller advised that the runway was covered with 1/8” of wet snow and braking action was reported as good. The pilot noted the airport was in sight about 4 miles out, and he executed a straight-in approach to runway 13. He verified that the landing gear was down. His intention was to touchdown at the landing reference speed (Vref) to minimize the need for braking. The airplane was lined up with the extended runway centerline and the pilot disconnected the autopilot about 2 miles from the runway. The pilot recalled that during landing, about 8 to 10 feet above ground level (agl), he received an aerodynamic stall warning with the stick shaker. At first, the touchdown seemed normal, but then the airplane started to drift to the left. The pilot’s efforts to maintain directional control were not successful. The airplane “lurched hard” when it impacted the snowbank along the left side of the runway. When the airplane came to rest, the pilot shut down the engine, and the airplane was evacuated. One of the passengers confirmed 3-green landing gear down lights while on approach. The airplane appeared to be slightly left of the runway centerline and quickly drifted to the left after it touched down. When left wing caught the snowbank the airplane departed the left side of the runway. The wind was almost calm when the passenger exited the airplane. Another passenger estimated about 2 to 3 inches of snow was covering the runway when they evacuated the airplane. An examination of the accident site revealed runway wheel marks (compressed snow) corresponding to the airplane beginning about 150 ft before the touchdown zone (1,000-ft) markers. At touchdown, the left main wheel was 6 to 8 ft from the left side of the runway (about 30 ft left of centerline), and the airplane appeared to depart the left side of the runway about 140 ft after the beginning of the wheel tracks. The snowbanks on each side of the runway were 2 to 3 ft high. Onboard data indicated that the airplane crossed the runway arrival threshold at 92 KIAS. The airplane touched down about 5 seconds later at 85 KIAS. It subsequently departed the left side of the runway and came to rest about 1,400 ft from the threshold. The data did not record any activation of the stall warning system. Postaccident examination revealed damage to the outboard right wing. The left main landing gear remained extended; however, the right main landing gear was retracted in the wheel well. Further examination revealed the right main landing gear actuator housing was fractured along the length of the housing. The fracture surface exhibited features consistent with an overstress failure. Additionally, the housing was deformed outward at the fracture consistent with an overpressure event. It is likely that the right main landing gear down lock was moved to the unlocked position when the airplane encountered the snowbank during the runway excursion. Without the down lock engaged, sideloading of the landing gear resulted in excessive hydraulic pressure within the actuator, an overstress fracture, and outward deformation of the housing. Once the hydraulic pressure was relieved due to the actuator failure the right main landing gear collapsed. The right tire likely went flat during this time. The airplane flight manual specified approach speeds of 91 KIAS and 96 KIAS with 50% flaps and operating weights of 5,000 lbs. and 5,550 lbs., respectively. Aerodynamic stall speeds with 50% flaps and 0° angle of bank were noted at 72 KIAS and 74 KIAS at operating weights of 5,200 lbs. and 5,550 lbs., respectively. The available information revealed that the landing approach was performed at an appropriate airspeed and the airplane touched down under control. However, it touched down left of the runway centerline due to the snow-covered runway and night lighting conditions. Once the left wing and left main landing gear struck the snow bank bordering the runway, the pilot was unable to maintain directional control and the airplane departed the runway. The data did not indicate any mechanical failures or malfunctions with respect to the airplane that would have precluded normal operations.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of control on ground during landing
  2. Runway excursion during landing (landing roll)
  3. Landing gear collapse during landing (landing roll)
  4. Abnormal runway contact during landing (flare/touchdown) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Runway/land/takeoff/taxi surface › Snow/slush/ice covered surface › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,258 hours in all; 28 in this make and model; 32 in the last 90 days; 32 in the last 30 days; 3,171 as pilot in command; 1,988 on instruments
  • Last flight review: December 11, 2024
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 912.8 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 12, 2024; 121.6 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 6,000 lb
  • Seats: 7
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Williams International FJ33-5A (turbofan); 791 hours total
  • Operator: Foxtrot Jet LLC

The flight

  • Departed from: STP St. Paul MN at 4:06 am
  • Destination: SPF Spearfish SD
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 13, 6,401 ft by 75 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 140° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 4,900 ft; scat at 3,600 ft
  • Temperature: 14°F (-10°C), dew point 12°F (-11°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.08 inHg
  • Observation at 11:35 pm from KSPF

Weather report (METAR): METAR KSPF 040635Z AUTO 14007KT 7SM -SN SCT036 SCT042 OVC049 M10/M11 A3008

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers5

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN25LA069.