The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN16LA247 · Final report

Beech E 90 accident near Longmont, Colorado, June 26, 2016

On June 26, 2016 at about 8:00 pm local time, a 1978 Beech E 90, registered N92DV, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Longmont, Colorado (Vance Brand airport). It was a skydiving flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 15 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's unintentional activation of the green jump light before the airplane was properly configured and slowed for a jump and the jumpers' improper decision to continue with the jump after they recognized that the airplane was at a higher-than-normal airspeed. Contributing to the accident were the pilot’s failure to recognize that the amber light remained on after the first jump and the senior jumper's decision not to inform the pilot that the amber light remained on following the first jump.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 26, 2016 · about 8:00 pm local time
Place
Longmont, Colorado · Vance Brand · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 15 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Beech E 90, built 1978 · all E 90s on the register
Registration
N92DV · registry record · serial LW-292
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Skydiving flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot was conducting a skydiving flight with 15 skydivers on board. The pilot reported that, at 5,000 ft above ground level, he reconfigured the airplane for a climb and activated the interior amber jump lights, which indicated that the door could be opened to spot the jump zone. Two jumpers safely exited the airplane at that time. The pilot then initiated another climb. The pilot did not recall any jump indication lights being illuminated in the cabin during the climb, and none of the remaining jumpers notified him of any illuminated jump lights. However, three of the jumpers later reported that the amber jump light remained illuminated at that time. One of the jumpers informed a senior jumper from the operator that the light was on, but he indicated that it was not a problem, and the jumpers all affirmed that no one informed the pilot that the amber light remained on. The three jumpers reported that, before reaching the jump location, when the pilot was in the process of configuring the airplane for the jump, the jump indication lights changed from amber to green, which is intended to indicate that it is safe to jump and prompted the jumpers to climb out of the airplane; however, the airplane was not correctly configured or at the proper airspeed for the jump. The three jumpers noted that the airspeed seemed faster than normal because they had difficulty holding onto the airplane. One of the jumpers, who struggled to swing his leg normally, jumped from the airplane and then struck the horizontal stabilizer. The pilot reported that he felt the flight controls jolt and heard a "thud" sound and then switched the jump lights to red and instructed the remaining jumpers to remain in the airplane. The pilot descended and landed the airplane without further incident. The jumper who struck the stabilizer was unable to move his arms and descended with his back to the ground until his automatic activation device deployed his parachute. He was subsequently transported to the hospital with serious injuries. The accident is consistent with the pilot not reconfiguring the jump light system properly following the first jump and unintentionally turning on the green jump light before the airplane was configured properly or at the proper airspeed for a safe jump and not recognizing that he had done so. Additionally, the senior jumper did not tell the pilot that the amber light remained on after the first jump, and the jumpers improperly decided to exit the airplane even though they recognized the airplane was at a higher-than-normal airspeed.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Miscellaneous/other during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Lighting system › (general) › Unintentional use/operation
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Passenger
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Pilot
  • factor Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Other/unknown
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Lack of communication › Other/unknown

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 869 hours in all; 93 in this make and model; 204 in the last 90 days; 110 in the last 30 days; 783 as pilot in command; 541 on instruments
  • Last flight review: October 8, 2015
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: none
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 15,829.3 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme
  • Maximum gross weight: 10,099 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine 1: Pratt & Whitney PT6-28 (turboprop); 10,634 hours total
  • Engine 2: Pratt & Whitney PT6-28 (turboprop); 10,751 hours total
  • Operator: Mile Hi Skydiving Center, Inc.,

The flight

  • Departed from: LMO Longmont CO at 7:45 pm
  • Destination: LMO Longmont CO
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 060° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 90°F (32°C), dew point 50°F (10°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.29 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from KLMO

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers114

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN16LA247.