The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN14GA135 · Final report

Cessna 210E accident near Oden, Arkansas, January 31, 2014

On January 31, 2014 at about 7:17 pm local time, a 1965 Cessna 210E, registered N4957U, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Oden, Arkansas. It was a public-use flight (state) under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s improper decision to fly into an area with reported marginal meteorological conditions in an airplane not maintained for instrument flight and his subsequent failure to maintain clearance from trees and terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 31, 2014 · about 7:17 pm local time
Place
Oden, Arkansas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Cessna 210E, built 1965 · all 210Es on the register
Registration
N4957U · no longer on the register · serial 21058657
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Public-use flight (state) · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The commercial pilot departed on a fire detection flight for a state fire commission using a predetermined flight route. The pilot was receiving flight-following services from the dispatch center and was reporting his flight progress to a dispatcher. The pilot reported entering the eastern boundary of the forest district and then turning north toward the next checkpoint. Five minutes later, the pilot reported that he was turning back due to low cloud ceilings. About 14 minutes later, the airplane impacted trees on a ridgeline, which had an elevation of 1,473 ft, and the main wreckage was located 0.3 mile south of the ridgeline. A postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no evidence of mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. Examination of the propeller revealed damage consistent with a medium-to-high power setting at impact. Although the airplane was equipped and certificated for flight in instrument meteorological conditions, the instruments required for instrument flight were not maintained to those standards; therefore, the airplane was limited to flight in visual flight rules conditions only. Surface weather reports indicated low cloud ceilings of 700 to 1,100 ft above ground level along most of the route of flight. Wave clouds and associated turbulence also existed in the area about the time of the accident. A surface weather reporting station located 21 nautical miles west of the accident site and within the planned route of flight was reporting clouds overcast at 500 ft at the time of the accident. The fire commission's aviation department did not use flight risk assessments. No record was found indicating that the pilot received a preflight weather briefing; however, it could not be determined if the pilot obtained weather information using other sources. Toxicological testing detected nortriptyline, which can be impairing, in the pilot's liver; however, no evidence was found indicating that the nortriptyline impaired his decision-making or flying skills at or around the time of the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Effect on operation
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Navigation system › (general) › Not specified
  • Organizational issues › Management › Culture › Standard operating practices › Operator
  • Personnel issues › Physical › Health/Fitness › Use of medication/drugs › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 2,800 hours in all; 1 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,870 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, December 18, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,097 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO-520-A5 (piston); 1,010 hours total
  • Fire on the ground
  • Operator: State Of Arkansas Forestry Commission

The flight

  • Departed from: M78 Malvern AR at 5:40 pm
  • Destination: M78 Malvern AR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 700 ft
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 52°F (11°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.87 inHg
  • Observation at 7:15 pm from KMEZ, 22 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.