The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN14FA224 · Final report

Piper PA 32R-300 accident near Highmore, South Dakota, April 28, 2014

On April 28, 2014 at about 2:16 am local time, a 1976 Piper PA 32R-300, registered N8700E, was destroyed in an accident during enroute near Highmore, South Dakota. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 4 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's decision to continue the flight into known deteriorating weather conditions at a low altitude and his subsequent failure to remain clear of an unlit wind turbine. Contributing to the accident was the inoperative obstruction light on the wind turbine, which prevented the pilot from visually identifying the wind turbine.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 28, 2014 · about 2:16 am local time
Place
Highmore, South Dakota · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
4 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA 32R-300, built 1976 · all PA 32R-300s on the register
Registration
N8700E · no longer on the register · serial 32R-7680159
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

During a dark night cross-country flight, the instrument-rated pilot was approaching the intended airport for landing when the airplane collided with the blades of a wind turbine tower. The weather had started to deteriorate and precipitation echoes were observed on radar. Witnesses in the area described low clouds, windy conditions, and precipitation. In addition, weather briefing records and statements made to a witness indicate that the pilot was aware of the current and forecast weather conditions for the route of flight. Investigators were unable to determine why the airplane was operating at a low altitude; however, the pilot was likely attempting to remain clear of the clouds even though both the pilot and the airplane were capable of flying in instrument meteorological conditions. An examination of the airplane, systems, and engine revealed no anomalies that would have precluded normal operation. Toxicology findings revealed a small amount of ethanol in the pilot's blood, which was unlikely due to ingestion since no ethanol was found in liver or muscle tissue. The investigation revealed that the wind turbine farm was not marked on either sectional chart covering the accident location; however, the pilot was familiar with the area and with the wind turbine farm. Investigators were not able to determine what the pilot was using for navigation just before the accident. The light on the wind turbine tower that was struck was not operational at the time of the accident, and the outage was not documented in a notice to airmen. The wind turbine that was struck was the 5th tower in a string of towers oriented east to west, then the string continued south and southwest with an additional 13 towers. If the pilot observed the lights from the surrounding wind turbines, it is possible that he perceived a break in the light string between the wind turbines as an obstacle-free zone.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during enroute defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • factor Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › (general) › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Object/animal/substance › (general) › Compliance w/ procedure

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 3,895.8 hours in all; 100.6 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: January 18, 2013
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,766 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 17, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Lycoming IO-540-K1G5D (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground

The flight

  • Departed from: KHRX Hereford TX at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: 9D0 Highmore SD
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night, dark
  • Wind: from 010° at 19 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,600 ft
  • Temperature: 43°F (6°C), dew point 41°F (5°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.37 inHg
  • Observation at 2:24 am from KPIR, 35 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

30 documents, released by the NTSB on April 8, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

#DocumentWhat it is
1 Weather Study PDF, 14 pages View Download
2 Personal Electronic Devices – Specialist Factual Report PDF, 3 pages View Download
3 Global Positioning System Device – Specialist Factual Report PDF, 3 pages View Download
4 Record of Conversation – FAA PDF, 1 page View Download
5 Record of Conversation - Pilot Family Members PDF, 2 pages View Download
6 Record of Conversation – Witnesses PDF, 2 pages View Download
7 Witness Statement - Richard Sanchez at Hereford Tx PDF, 1 page View Download
8 Csc Duats Program Weather Briefing - N8700E PDF, 52 pages View Download
9 Flight Service Station Communications – Transcript PDF, 2 pages View Download
10 Fuel Batch Report from Hrx Airport PDF, 1 page View Download
11 Satisfactory Fuel Quality Test at Hrx Airport PDF, 1 page View Download
12 FAA Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation - Tower #14 PDF, 3 pages View Download
13 Power Supply, Flash Head, and Photocell Examination PDF, 2 pages View Download
14 Google Earth Maps PDF, 4 pages View Download
15 Sectional Charts Excerpts PDF, 7 pages View Download
16 Toxicology Report PDF, 1 page View Download
17 Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation PDF, 2 pages View Download
18 Non-disclosure Agreement PDF, 2 pages View Download
19 Release of Aircraft Wreckage, NTSB Form 6120.15 PDF, 1 page View Download
20 Photo 1 – Aft Fuselage PDF, 1 page View Download
21 Photo 2 - Wing Spar and Central Lower Fuselage and Cabin PDF, 1 page View Download
22 Photo 3 - Right Wing PDF, 1 page View Download
23 Photo 4 - Left Wing PDF, 1 page View Download
24 Photo 5 - Engine PDF, 1 page View Download
25 Photo 6 - Propeller PDF, 1 page View Download
26 Photo 7 - Debris Field PDF, 1 page View Download
27 Photo 8 - Wind Turbine Tower #14 PDF, 1 page View Download
28 Photo 9 - Left Wing Reassembly PDF, 1 page View Download
29 Photo 10 - Right Wing Reassembly PDF, 1 page View Download
30 Photo 11 - Empennage PDF, 1 page View Download

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.