The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13WA173 · Preliminary: the investigation is not finished

Swearingen SA226 accident near Murcia, Es, November 13, 2012

On November 13, 2012 at about 12:05 pm local time, a Swearingen SA226, registered ECJYC, suffered minor damage in an accident during takeoff near Murcia (Murcia-San Javier airport). It was a positioning flight under non-U.S. private rules. No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The NTSB has not yet published a probable cause for this accident. Investigations usually take one to two years; this page updates when the final report is released.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 13, 2012 · about 12:05 pm local time
Place
Murcia, Spain · Murcia-San Javier
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 3 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Swearingen SA226 TC · all SA226s on the register
Registration
ECJYC · no longer on the register
Damage
Minor damage
Flight
Positioning flight · non-U.S. private rules

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

On November 13, 2012, at 1205 coordinated universal time, a Swearingen Fairchild SA-226-TC, Spanish registered EC-JYC, operated by Zorex.org, sustained minor damage during the takeoff roll from the Murcia-San Javier Airport (LELC), Murcia, Spain. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The pilot and two crew members were not injured. The positioning flight was originating at the time of the incident and was en route to Huesca-Pirineos Airport (LEHC), Huesca, Spain. The Spanish investigators received reports that during the takeoff run from runway 05, the airplane encountered a problem steering the main landing gear. The airplane departed the left side of the runway. The incident investigation is under the jurisdiction and control of the Spanish government. This report is for information purposes only and contains only information released by or obtained from the Spanish government or the Comisión De Investigación De Accidentes E Incidentes De Aviación Civil. Further information pertaining to this incident may be obtained from: Comisión De Investigación De Accidentes E Incidentes De Aviación Civil C/Fruela, 6 28011 Madrid, Spain

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during takeoff
  2. Loss of control on ground during takeoff defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Other authority investigated

The aircraft

  • Landing gear: retractable

The flight

  • Runway 05
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 010° at 14 knots
  • Visibility: 6.2 statute miles
  • Sky: a few clouds at 3,000 ft
  • Temperature: 63°F (17°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.97 inHg
  • Observation at 12:00 pm from LEAL

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.