The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA531 · Final report

Cessna/Weaver 305 - E accident near Paris, Texas, August 31, 2013

On August 31, 2013, a 1995 Cessna/Weaver 305 - E, registered N862, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Paris, Texas (Cox Field Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The failure of a landing gear O-ring, which prevented the pilot from being able to maintain directional control of the airplane during landing.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 31, 2013
Place
Paris, Texas · Cox Field Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 1 person was on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna/Weaver 305 - E E, built 1995
Registration
N862 · registry record · serial WA862
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

After touchdown, the right main landing gear began to oscillate and brake. The pilot applied the left brake to compensate for the right main landing gear braking; the propeller then contacted the runway, and the airplane nosed over. Examination of the right main landing gear revealed that the outside O-ring was blown, which prevented the pilot from being able to maintain directional control of the airplane during landing.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power) during landing defining event
  2. Loss of control on ground during landing (flare/touchdown)
  3. Attempted remediation/recovery during landing (landing roll)
  4. Abnormal runway contact during landing (landing roll)
  5. Nose over/nose down during landing (landing roll)
  6. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Landing gear system › Main landing gear attach sec › Failure
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Directional control › Attain/maintain not possible

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 650 hours in all
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: unk
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Last inspection: inspection type not recorded
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-470 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: PRX Paris TX
  • Destination: PRX Paris TX
  • Flight plan: none
  • Runway 17, 6,002 ft by 100 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: dusk
  • Wind: from 150° at 7 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 95°F (35°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.88 inHg
  • Observation at 11:35 pm from PRX

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.