The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA360 · Final report

Enstrom F-28A accident near Danbury, Texas, June 19, 2013

On June 19, 2013 at about 3:00 pm local time, a Enstrom F-28A (helicopter), registered N485PM, was destroyed in an accident during approach (VFR pattern downwind) near Danbury, Texas. It was an instructional flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The total loss of engine power due to the failure of a connecting rod for reasons that could not be determined during postaccident examination.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 19, 2013 · about 3:00 pm local time
Place
Danbury, Texas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Enstrom F-28A · all F-28As on the register
Registration
N485PM · registry record · serial 259
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Instructional flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot had just taken off in the helicopter when the pilot and the flight instructor heard a loud “bang,” and the engine lost total power. The flight instructor took control of the helicopter and initiated an autorotation to available terrain from a low altitude; however, when the helicopter touched down, it encountered a rut and rolled over on its right side. The main rotor blades were destroyed, and the tail boom was severed. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that a connecting rod had failed. The reason the connecting rod failed could not be determined during postaccident examination.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during approach (VFR pattern downwind) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent
  3. Autorotation Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine (reciprocating) › Recip eng cyl section › Failure

Flight instructor

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 5,000 hours in all; 5,000 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: December 1, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 2
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Dual student

  • Certificate: student
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Maximum gross weight: 2,150 lb
  • Seats: 3
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming HIO-360-C1B (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: 07TA Danbury TX at 2:50 pm
  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Temperature: 0°F (-18°C), dew point 0°F (-18°C)

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew2

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.