The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13FA143 · Final report

Raytheon Aircraft Company A36 accident near Richwood, Louisiana, January 24, 2013

On January 24, 2013 at about 7:49 pm local time, a Raytheon Aircraft Company A36, registered N980SS, was destroyed in an accident during approach (IFR missed approach) near Richwood, Louisiana (Monroe Regional Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 4 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during a missed approach in instrument meteorological conditions.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 24, 2013 · about 7:49 pm local time
Place
Richwood, Louisiana · Monroe Regional Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
4 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Raytheon Aircraft Company A36
Registration
N980SS · no longer on the register · serial E-3152
Damage
Destroyed
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

While approaching the airport to land in instrument meteorological conditions, the pilot checked in with the local approach controller and informed him that he was south of the airport at 7,000 feet mean sea level (msl). When the airplane was about 33 miles from the airport, the local controller instructed the pilot to turn left 15 degrees to intercept the localizer for the landing runway and descend to 2,000 feet msl. Radar data showed the airplane turn to intercept the localizer but then overshoot the inbound course. The airplane was about 2 miles left (north) of course and continuing north when the local controller advised the pilot that he had flown through the final approach course and was still northbound. The pilot acknowledged the information and requested a vector to turn back to the localizer course. The local controller then instructed the pilot to turn right 70 degrees to re-intercept the inbound course, and the pilot acknowledged the heading. Radar data showed the airplane turn onto the localizer course. When the airplane was 4 miles from the final approach fix, the local controller cleared the approach and instructed the pilot to contact the tower. After the pilot contacted the tower, the tower controller cleared the airplane for landing. After the pilot told the tower controller that the airplane was at 3,000 feet msl, the controller cancelled the landing clearance because the airplane was at too high an altitude to intercept the glideslope and issued missed approach instructions; however, the pilot made no further communications to air traffic control. Radar data subsequently showed the airplane make a tight, right-descending turn to the south while at 1,600 feet msl and 211 knots. The airplane climbed to 1,900 feet msl and then descended. The airplane disappeared from radar when it was headed south-southwest at 1,200 feet msl. Witnesses saw the airplane rapidly descending almost vertically toward the ground. They lost sight of the airplane as it descended below the tree tops and then subsequently heard the it impacting trees and terrain. A postaccident examination of the airplane did not reveal any anomalies with the engine, flight controls, or other airplane systems that would have precluded normal operation. Although postmortem toxicology showed the presence of ethanol, the variability of the amounts found indicate that it was likely from postmortem production and not ingestion.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Attempted remediation/recovery during approach (IFR missed approach)
  2. Loss of control in flight during approach (IFR missed approach) defining event
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach (IFR missed approach)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
  • Personnel issues › Task performance › Workload management › (general) › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › (general) › Response/compensation

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: airplane single-engine; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 470 hours in all; 10 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: July 27, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Maximum gross weight: 3,650 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: retractable
  • Engine: Cont Motor IO-550 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
  • Fire on the ground
  • Operator: Central Flying Service, Inc.

The flight

  • Departed from: KBMT Beaumont TX at 6:25 pm
  • Destination: KMLU Richwood LA
  • Flight plan: IFR
  • Runway 4, 7,505 ft by 150 ft

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 050° at 12 knots
  • Visibility: 2 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 700 ft
  • Temperature: 54°F (12°C), dew point 48°F (9°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.26 inHg
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from KMLU, 45 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.