The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN13FA067 · Final report

Piper PA-28-180 accident near Hillsdale, Michigan, November 21, 2012

On November 21, 2012 at about 11:20 pm local time, a Piper PA-28-180, registered N40781, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Hillsdale, Michigan (Hillsdale Minucipal Airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from terrain during a straight-in night visual flight rules approach to land in hazy weather conditions. Contributing to the accident were the pilot's lack of recent night flying experience, the nonfunctional precision approach path indicator system on the selected runway, and the inaccurate Kollsman setting in the altimeter.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
November 21, 2012 · about 11:20 pm local time
Place
Hillsdale, Michigan · Hillsdale Minucipal Airport · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-180 · all PA-28-180s on the register
Registration
N40781 · no longer on the register · serial 28-7405065
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

After a 1.5-hour uneventful night visual flight rules cross-country flight and about 18 miles from the destination airport, the pilot contacted the airport UNICOM and requested that the runway lights be turned on. Subsequently, the airport manager who was monitoring the UNICOM frequency turned on the runway lights. The airplane did not land, and no distress calls from the pilot were reported. The wreckage was found 1.25 miles east of the approach end of the runway. Examination of the wreckage indicated that the airplane struck the trees in a shallow descent. The airport manager and another pilot reported that hazy conditions existed about the time of the accident. No mechanical anomalies were discovered with the airframe or engine. The pilot only had 16.4 hours of night flight time, and his most recent logged night flight time was about 10 years before the accident flight. Family members stated that the pilot did not like to fly at night. The selected runway's precision approach path indicator (PAPI) system was not functional. An experienced pilot who landed his airplane at the airport shortly before the accident reported that he chose to land on another runway after circling the airport and noting that the PAPI was nonfunctional because it was dark on that side of the airport. Examination of the altimeter at the accident site showed that 30.38 inches of Mercury (inHg) was set in the instrument's Kollsman window; however, the area barometric pressure at the time of the accident was 30.17 inHg. The altimeter was bench tested and found to be functional. The inaccurate Kollsman setting would have shown a higher indicated altitude on the altimeter in relation to the airplane's actual altitude over terrain. Thus, the pilot likely thought that he was flying at a higher altitude if he was relying solely on the altimeter instead of on outside visual references during the approach. The combination of the pilot's lack of night flying time, the nonfunctional PAPI system, and the inaccurate altimeter setting all contributed to the accident.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Controlled flight into terrain or object (CFIT) during approach defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • factor Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Recent experience › Pilot
  • factor Environmental issues › Operating environment › Airport facilities/design › Runway lighting › Contributed to outcome
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Attention/monitoring › Monitoring environment › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Identification/recognition › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Altitude › Not attained/maintained
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Haze/smoke › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 765 hours in all; 38 in this make and model; 10 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days; 765 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: December 26, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 2,541 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, October 5, 2012; 8 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A4A (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: I68 Lebanon OH at 10:00 pm
  • Destination: JYM Hillsdale MI
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Visibility: 7 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 48°F (9°C), dew point 43°F (6°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.17 inHg
  • Observation at 11:14 pm from JYM, 2 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.