The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN10FA316 · Final report

Piper PA-28-181 accident near Umpire, Arkansas, June 13, 2010

On June 13, 2010 at about 2:30 pm local time, a Piper PA-28-181, registered N6076H, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering near Umpire, Arkansas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 4 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot’s continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in spatial disorientation.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 13, 2010 · about 2:30 pm local time
Place
Umpire, Arkansas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
4 people were killed.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-28-181 · all PA-28-181s on the register
Registration
N6076H · no longer on the register · serial 28-7890161
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

According to a witness, the non-instrument-rated pilot departed when the weather was overcast at 3,000 feet and the surrounding mountain ridges were obscured. An airport located about 32 miles north of the departure airport, in the direction of travel, was reporting slightly lower ceilings. The pilot requested winds aloft for 3,000 and 6,000 feet, stating, “I need to be at about fifty five hundred probably to be safe,” adding “there’s some three thousand foot tops of some...terrain there in places.” He was likely referring to a mountain range that he would have been approaching about the time of the accident. Thus, the pilot likely intended to climb above the altitude of the reported cloud base, and, therefore, he most likely did enter the clouds. No radar data was available for the flight, and there were no eyewitnesses to the accident; however, a witness reported hearing a low flying airplane followed by the sound of an impact. A postaccident examination revealed that the left wing spar had fractured in upward bending as a result of overload; the bottom cap failed in tension. The examination did not disclose any preimpact mechanical problems with the airplane. Federal Aviation Administration guidance indicates that if neither horizon nor surface references exist, the attitude of an airplane must be determined by artificial means from the flight instruments. Further, during periods of low visibility, the supporting senses sometimes conflict with what is seen; when this happens, a pilot is particularly vulnerable to disorientation. The pilot did not possess an instrument rating, which, coupled with the low visibility as he entered the clouds, would have made him vulnerable to spatial disorientation.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during uncontrolled descent
  2. Aircraft structural failure during maneuvering defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
  • cause Personnel issues › Psychological › Perception/orientation/illusio › Spatial disorientation › Pilot
  • Aircraft › Aircraft structures › Wing structure › (general) › Failure
  • Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge › Experience/qualifications › Total instrument experience › Pilot
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Low ceiling › Contributed to outcome
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Haze/smoke › Contributed to outcome
  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 159 hours in all; 143 in this make and model; 85 in the last 90 days; 24 in the last 30 days; 111 as pilot in command
  • Medical certificate: Class 3 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,513 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, September 14, 2009
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,550 lb
  • Seats: 4
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-360-A4M (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: DEQ De Queen AR at 2:15 pm
  • Destination: 3MO Lakeview AR
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 170° at 3 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,000 ft
  • Temperature: 81°F (27°C), dew point 75°F (24°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.05 inHg
  • Observation at 2:20 pm from DEQ, 21 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.