The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB CEN10CA500 · Final report

Cessna 150K accident near Gaylord, Michigan, August 24, 2010

On August 24, 2010 at about 9:30 pm local time, a Cessna 150K, registered N6032G, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Gaylord, Michigan. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person had minor injuries. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
August 24, 2010 · about 9:30 pm local time
Place
Gaylord, Michigan · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person had minor injuries.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 150K · all 150Ks on the register
Registration
N6032G · no longer on the register · serial 15071532
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that he was on a local flight and the engine gradually lost power. He performed the checklist for a loss of engine power and the airplane did not regain full power. The pilot then chose an emergency landing field, extended full flaps, and the engine "quit." As the pilot pumped the throttle, the engine restarted and the airplane started to climb. The engine lost power again and the pilot chose another field. During the forced landing, the airplane nosed over. After the accident, the engine ran during a subsequent test run. The pilot reported that a cup of water was removed from the right fuel tank sump and a quarter cup from the front sump during the airplane preflight. The local airport's temperature and dew point were plotted on the carburetor icing chart listed in Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin CE-09-35, and their intersection fell in the “serious icing (glide power)” range.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Not determined › Not determined › (general) › (general) › Unknown/Not determined

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Flight time: 76 hours in all; 74 in this make and model; 4 in the last 90 days; 2 in the last 30 days; 27 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: May 12, 2010
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Injury: minor injuries

The aircraft

  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Cont Motor O-200 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: GLR Gaylord MI at 9:00 pm
  • Destination: GLR Gaylord MI
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 180° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 3,900 ft
  • Temperature: 73°F (23°C), dew point 61°F (16°C)
  • Observation at 7:53 pm from GLR

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.