Sikorsky S-61N accident near Kekaha, Hawaii, February 22, 2022
On February 22, 2022 at about 8:20 pm local time, a 1962 Sikorsky S-61N (helicopter), registered N615CK, was destroyed in an accident during landing near Kekaha, Hawaii (Barking Sands Navy Base airport). It was an external-load flight under external-load helicopter rules (Part 133). 4 people were killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The improper installation of the fore/aft primary servo by maintenance personnel, which resulted in the attaching hardware backing out and which subsequently rendered the helicopter uncontrollable. Contributing to the accident was the company’s quality control personnel to identify the improper installation before certifying the helicopter for flight.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- February 22, 2022 · about 8:20 pm local time · cases in 2022
- Place
- Kekaha, Hawaii · Barking Sands Navy Base · cases near this airport · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 4 people were killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Sikorsky S-61N, built 1962 · all S-61Ns on the register
- Registration
- N615CK · no longer on the register · serial 61814
- Damage
- Destroyed
- Flight
- External-load flight · external-load helicopter rules (Part 133)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The accident helicopter was under contract to the United States Navy. The mission for the accident flight involved locating a training torpedo in the open waters, retrieving the torpedo using a recovery basket/cage system, then returning the torpedo to Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) by sling load. According to automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data, after the helicopter departed, it proceeded north-northwest to an area about 44 miles away. After maneuvering in the area, the helicopter proceeded south-southeast to return to PMRF. As the helicopter approached the facility, it crossed the shoreline and began a shallow left turn as it maneuvered to the north, into the prevailing wind. As the helicopter neared the predetermined drop-off site, the left turn stopped, and the helicopter proceeded in a northeasterly direction. Multiple witnesses located near the accident site reported that as the helicopter continued the left turn towards the drop-off site, the turn stopped, and it began to travel in a northeast direction. The witnesses noted that as the helicopter flew about 200 ft above the ground, it gradually pitched nose down and impacted nose first, in a near-vertical attitude. An examination of the wreckage revealed the flight control fore/aft servo input link remained connected at its clevis end to the flight control fore/aft bellcrank, located adjacent to the main gearbox. However, the rod end was partially connected to the fore/aft servo input clevises and its bolt had mostly backed out of its normally installed position. The bolt exhibited no evidence of fractures or visible deformation and its threads exhibited no unusual wear. Therefore, the bolt likely backed out of its normally installed position during the accident flight due to the absence of its nut and cotter pin. This would have caused an uncommanded input to the fore/aft servo, resulting in the helicopter’s nose-down attitude, and the inability of the crew to control the pitch attitude of the helicopter. The fore/aft primary servo was installed on December 28, 2021. About 7.5 flight hours had elapsed from the time the fore/aft primary servo was installed until the day of the accident. The mechanic who installed the fore/aft servo input link to the fore/aft primary servo likely failed to correctly install the attaching hardware. The company’s certified inspector and who oversaw and inspected all of the work at completion, failed to ensure the hardware attaching the fore/aft servo input link to the fore/aft primary servo was installed correctly.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during landing defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Organizational issues › Support/oversight/monitoring › Oversight › Oversight of maintenance › Maintenance provider
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Inspection › Post maintenance inspection › Maintenance personnel
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Maintenance › Installation › Maintenance personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: instructor: helicopter; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 16,515 hours in all
- Last flight review: December 7, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: unk
- Injury: fatal
Pilot
- Certificate: airline transport pilot
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 7,060 hours in all; 2,682 in this make and model
- Last flight review: December 8, 2021
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: unk
- Injury: fatal
Cabin Crew
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
Cabin Crew
- Seat: rear
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 36,745 hours
- Last inspection: approved inspection programme, February 9, 2022; 7 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 21,000 lb
- Seats: 11
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine 1: Ge CT58-140-2 (turboshaft); 18,534 hours total
- Engine 2: Ge CT58-140-2 (turboshaft); 12,121 hours total
- Fire on the ground
- Operator: Croman CORP
The flight
- Runway PHBK, 6,002 ft by 150 ft
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 280° at 6 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 79°F (26°C), dew point 64°F (18°C)
- Altimeter: 30.10 inHg
- Observation at 10:51 am from PHBK
Weather report (METAR): PHBK 222051Z AUTO 28006KT 10SM CLR 26/18 A3010 RMK AO2 SLP193 T02560183 52004
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 4 |
Photographs from the investigation 3 pictures from the NTSB's docket, as the NTSB released them
Photo 1 –Front/left side of accident airplane. Photo
Photo 2 – Right/under side view of accident airplane. Photo
Photo 3 – View of attaching hardware of the Fore/Aft primary servo. PhotoThe NTSB's photographs with the NTSB's captions, at screen size. Open a picture to see it full size or to report one that should not be shown.
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
12 documents, released by the NTSB on July 26, 2023. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
Connections how this case links to the rest of the register
- N615CK: not on the register today · the record of its deregistration
- Sikorsky S-61 54 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Sikorsky 827 aircraft on the register
- Engine: Ge CT58-140-2 33 aircraft carry this series today · as the NTSB recorded it
- Engine: Ge CT58-140-2 33 aircraft carry this series today · as the NTSB recorded it
- Barking Sands Pmrf Airport · nearest airport
- Accidents and incidents in Hawaii 524 since 1982 · 86 in the last ten years
- Hawaii 650 aircraft registered
The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/ANC22FA018.json.
The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
