The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC17TA015 · Final report

Piper PA-32 accident near Pilot Point, Alaska, January 17, 2017

On January 17, 2017, a 1971 Piper PA-32, registered N4261T, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Pilot Point, Alaska. It was flown under charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135). 2 people were seriously injured. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's continued flight into known icing conditions, which resulted in structural icing and a forced landing on icy, snow-covered terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
January 17, 2017
Place
Pilot Point, Alaska · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
2 people were seriously injured.
Weather
instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
Aircraft
Piper PA-32 260, built 1971 · all PA-32s on the register
Registration
N4261T · no longer on the register · serial 32-7200013
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Flight · charter and air-taxi rules (Part 135)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The airline transport pilot reported that, at 800 ft during a visual flight rules cross-country flight, the windscreen began accumulating trace ice, so he landed the airplane at an airport that he was flying over on the route. An agent at the destination airport reported to the pilot by telephone that the visibility at the destination was 10 miles, that the clouds were at 3,000 ft, and that no ice was reported. Subsequently, the pilot decided to continue the flight toward the destination to "take a look" at the weather conditions. He stated to the passenger that he would return to the departure airport if the weather was poor. After departing and within 8 miles of the airport, the windscreen began to accumulate ice again, and the pilot maneuvered the airplane back toward the departure airport. The pilot stated that, shortly after, at 500 ft, the airplane encountered severe icing conditions. He stated that he saw that the windows and wing leading edges were rapidly accumulating ice, that the engine began running roughly, and that the flight controls began feeling "sluggish." The engine surged with corresponding propeller vibrations. Both the pilot and the passenger stated that instrument meteorological conditions were present when the airplane was at 500 ft. The airplane could not maintain altitude and descended through 400 ft, and the pilot conducted a forced landing on snow-covered terrain about 5 miles from the airport. During the landing, the nose and right main landing gears sheared off due to impact with ground ice, and the fuselage then impacted terrain. Both occupants sustained serious injuries, and the left wing, horizontal stabilizer, and fuselage sustained substantial damage. The pilot stated that there were no preimpact mechanical failures or malfunctions with the airframe or engine that would have precluded normal operation. Even though a review of weather information for the area where the reported icing encounter occurred revealed no probability of icing at the reported time and altitude of the encounter, the airplane previously encountered icing conditions in the area and the pilot subsequently landed the airplane to evaluate the ice and the weather. The pilot then decided to take off and continue the flight toward the destination. It is likely that the pilot flew the airplane into an area of visible moisture at below freezing temperatures and that the airplane and propeller accumulated ice, which resulted in reduced aerodynamic performance and prevented the airplane from maintaining altitude.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Structural icing during enroute
  2. Loss of engine power (partial) during enroute defining event
  3. Off-field or emergency landing during landing
  4. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during landing (landing roll)

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Decision related to condition
  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to structural icing › Effect on operation
  • Environmental issues › Physical environment › Terrain › Snowy/icy terrain › Contributed to outcome

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 12,824 hours in all; 9,873 in this make and model; 67 in the last 90 days; 38 in the last 30 days; 12,778 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: January 19, 2016
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (with waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: serious injuries

Passenger

  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 4,120.1 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, August 20, 2016
  • Maximum gross weight: 3,400 lb
  • Seats: 6
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming O-540-E4B5 (piston); 2,095 hours total
  • Operator: Van Air INC

The flight

  • Departed from: PNP Pilot Point AK
  • Destination: PTH Port Heiden AK
  • Flight plan: VFR

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 140° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 1.8 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 1,600 ft
  • Temperature: 9°F (-13°C), dew point 3°F (-16°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.22 inHg

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

6 documents, released by the NTSB on July 29, 2019. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.

The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.