The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily
Accidents · NTSB ANC14CA025 · Final report

Cessna 182J accident near Cooper Landing, Alaska, April 30, 2014

On April 30, 2014, a 1966 Cessna 182J, registered N3024F, was substantially damaged in an accident during maneuvering (low-alt flying) near Cooper Landing, Alaska. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The pilot's failure to correctly use carburetor heat, resulting in a loss of engine power and collision with terrain.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 5, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
April 30, 2014
Place
Cooper Landing, Alaska · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 4 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Cessna 182J, built 1966 · all 182Js on the register
Registration
N3024F · registry record · serial 18257124
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot stated that he was flying down a glacier for an extended period of time at a low power setting without the carburetor heat on. Near the toe of the glacier, he attempted to add power to level the airplane, but the engine did not respond. He stated that their altitude was low and he landed on the glacier moraine, and the airplane nosed over, sustaining substantial damage to the wings and fuselage. The pilot stated that there were no preaccident mechanical anomalies with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. Based on the temperature and dew point at the time of the accident, the conditions were favorable for serious carburetor icing at descent power.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (partial) during maneuvering (low-alt flying) defining event
  2. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during emergency descent

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Lack of action › Pilot
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine fuel and control › Fuel control/carburetor › Incorrect use/operation
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Temp/humidity/pressure › Conducive to carburetor icing › Effect on equipment

Pilot

  • Certificate: private
  • Ratings: single-engine land
  • Medical certificate: Class 3
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine 1: Cont Motor O-470 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total
  • Engine 2: Cont Motor O-470 SERIES (piston); 0 hours total

The flight

  • Departed from: Soldotna AK
  • Destination: Soldotna AK
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 250° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 48°F (9°C), dew point 30°F (-1°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.23 inHg
  • Observation at 5:56 am from PASX, 29 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flight crew1
Passengers3

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text never names anyone involved. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.