Amateur-built RV-6A accident near Preston, Idaho, September 14, 2022
On September 14, 2022 at about 4:55 pm local time, a 1994 amateur-built RV-6A, registered N992KS, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute near Preston, Idaho. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 2 people were killed. The weather was instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The non-instrument-rated pilot’s continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in a loss of control due to spatial disorientation.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- September 14, 2022 · about 4:55 pm local time
- Place
- Preston, Idaho · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 2 people were killed.
- Weather
- instrument conditions (cloud, fog or low visibility)
- Aircraft
- Amateur-built RV-6A, built 1994
- Registration
- N992KS · registry record · serial 001
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
Two pilots departed on a visual-flight-rules cross-country flight as a flight of two airplanes, with the non-instrument-rated accident pilot in the lead position. About one hour into the flight, the pilots encountered clouds at their cruise altitude of 9,500 ft and climbed above the clouds to an altitude of 11,500 ft mean sea level (msl). The pilot of the second airplane reported that he visually acquired the accident airplane after it climbed to 11,500 ft, then lost visual contact as he obtained weather information for the destination airport. ADS-B information revealed that the accident pilot began a gradual descent from about 11,500 ft to about 9,800 ft before climbing back up to about 11,000 ft before the data ended. About this time, the accident pilot transmitted to the other pilot that he was “in a cloud and doing a 180°.” The second pilot recorded a short video of the accident airplane while the two airplanes were cruising at 11,500 ft. The footage showed the accident airplane flying over a broken to overcast cloud ceiling with cumulus and standing lenticular clouds present. A pilot report near the accident site issued about 15 minutes before the accident included clouds from 9,000 ft to 12,000 ft msl. The airplane impacted mountainous terrain about 2 nautical miles south of the last recorded ADS-B location at an elevation about 9,200 ft msl on a heading about 180° from its last recorded heading. The airplane was significantly fragmented. Postaccident examination of the airframe and engine revealed no preimpact mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation of the airplane. The airplane was not equipped with an attitude indicator, as the pilot had removed and replaced it with a unit capable of displaying artificial horizon data, in addition to other information, on a tablet computer. The extent of his operational experience with the unit and its display options was not determined. The reason for the pilot’s unannounced descent into the clouds could not be determined based on the available information; however, his lack of an instrument rating increased his susceptibility to spatial disorientation following the loss of visual reference to the horizon that he would have experienced upon entering clouds. The turning descent toward the accident site, as well as the fragmentation of the wreckage, which suggests a high-energy impact, are both consistent with a loss of control due to spatial disorientation.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during maneuvering (low-alt flying)
- VFR encounter with IMC during enroute defining event
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action performance › Pilot
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Effect on personnel
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Below VFR minima › Contributed to outcome
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Ceiling/visibility/precip › Clouds › Effect on operation
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: single-engine land
- Flight time: 195 hours in all
- Last flight review: October 11, 2020
- Medical certificate: BasicMed
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
Passenger
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 178.5 hours
- Last inspection: condition inspection, May 20, 2020
- Maximum gross weight: 1,650 lb
- Seats: 2
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Lycoming O-360-A2D (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: ONO Ontario Municipal Airport OR at 3:30 pm
- Destination: KRKS Rock Springs WY
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: overcast at 4,500 ft
- Temperature: 57°F (14°C), dew point 57°F (14°C)
- Altimeter: 30.04 inHg
- Observation at 11:15 am from K1U7, 14 miles away
Weather report (METAR): METAR K1U7 141715Z AUTO 00000KT 10SM BKN037 OVC045 14/14 A3004 RMK A01=
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flig | 1 | |||
| Passengers | 1 |
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR22FA347.
