The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB WPR13GA338 · Final report

Bell HH-1H accident near Mount Charleston, Nevada, July 23, 2013

On July 23, 2013 at about 5:20 am local time, a Bell HH-1H (helicopter), registered N233JP, was involved in an accident during maneuvering (hover) near Mount Charleston, Nevada (North Las Vegas airport). It was a public-use flight (local) under public-use (government) rules. 1 person was killed; 5 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The premature hoisting operation and the inadvertent disengagement of the hoist hook on the rescuer’s harness in dark night conditions. Contributing to the accident was a lack of direct audio communication between the rescuer and the hoist operator.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
July 23, 2013 · about 5:20 am local time
Place
Mount Charleston, Nevada · North Las Vegas · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was killed; 5 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Bell HH-1H · all HH-1Hs on the register
Registration
N233JP · registry record · serial 70-2478
Damage
Not recorded
Flight
Public-use flight (local) · public-use (government) rules

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The purpose of the flight was to rescue a stranded hiker from the side of the mountain in dark night conditions. Once on scene, the pilot, copilot, hoist operator, and two rescue crewmembers briefed that one of the rescue crewmembers would be lowered down to the hiker and that he would then help the hiker into the strop harness. The rescuer was to remain attached to the hoist hook that was attached to his sit harness via a carbineer throughout the rescue operation, which was planned to take about 30 seconds. The hoist hook had three attachment points: a main hook, a secondary hook, and a utility eye; it is likely that the rescuer's sit harness was attached to the main hook and that the strop harness was attached to the utility eye. The hoist operator reported that, after the rescuer was lowered down to the hiker, he observed the rescuer helping the hiker into the strop harness. The hoist operator then told the pilot that he would be cleared to move the helicopter to the left and aft to clear the rock face as soon as he "had the load." The hoist operator added that he saw the rescuer signal to begin the hoisting operation. The hiker reported that the rescuer put him into the harness while remaining attached to the hoist hook. He stated that the rescuer was moving purposefully and that his actions appeared very deliberate. The rescuer then told him to stand up, and he heard what he thought was the sound of a carabineer unclipping. It is likely that the rescuer's carabineer inadvertently became disengaged or partly disengaged from the hoist hook at this point. As the cable started moving upward, the hiker then noticed that the rescuer began rushing his actions, likely indicating that the hoist operation had begun before the rescuer was ready. As the hook was ascending, the rescuer grabbed both of the hiker's hands and placed them on the harness just below the hoist hook, which was at the hiker's eye level, and told to the hiker to hold on. During a rescue using a strop harness, the rescuer is supposed to leave the ground first. However, the hiker reported that his feet left the ground first while the rescuer remained on the ledge. The hiker then started to rotate and move away from the rock face. While moving away from the rock face, the hiker felt the rescuer grab him around his waist and then slide down his body until the rescuer fell, which resulted in his death. The hiker was hoisted into the helicopter and was uninjured. Examination of the harness and hoist hook revealed no damage that would have precluded normal operation. The hoist's main and secondary hooks did not have self-locking safety mechanisms; this design could allow a carabineer to travel upward against the hoist hook's nonlocking safety latch and inadvertently disengage the hook. Given the hiker's statement about hearing a carbineer unclipping and the rescuer's subsequent fall, it is likely that the hoist hook inadvertently disengaged from the rescuer's harness. The helicopter was not equipped to allow direct intercommunications between the hoist operator and the rescuer. Therefore, once the rescuer departed the helicopter, the only effective communication between the hoist operator and the rescuer was hand signals. Although the hoist operator was using night vision goggles during the flight, the dark night conditions likely limited his detail vision and made it difficult to see the rescuer's hand signals. The lack of direct audio communications between the hoist operator and the rescuer prevented the rescuer from being able to report a problem after the hoist operation began and might have contributed to the hoist activation occurring before the rescuer was ready.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. External load event (Rotorcraft) during maneuvering (hover) defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action sequence › Flight crew
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Agricultural/external load sys › Unintentional use/operation
  • factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Lack of communication › Not specified
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on personnel

Pilot

  • Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 2,754 hours in all; 90 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 35 in the last 30 days; 2,604 as pilot in command; 200 on instruments
  • Last flight review: January 10, 2012
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rgt
  • Injury: no injuries

Co-pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot, private
  • Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: helicopter
  • Flight time: 1,150 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 107 in the last 90 days; 34 in the last 30 days; 974 as pilot in command
  • Last flight review: July 27, 2011
  • Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: left
  • Injury: no injuries

Other crew

  • Flight time: 0 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: none
  • Injury: fatal

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 6,630 hours
  • Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, December 6, 2012
  • Maximum gross weight: 9,500 lb
  • Seats: 15
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Honneywell/Lycoming T53-L703 (turboshaft); 1,900 hours total
  • Operator: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

The flight

  • Departed from: VGT North Las Vegas NV at 4:50 am
  • Destination: VGT North Las Vegas NV
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: night
  • Wind: from 110° at 6 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: clear
  • Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 57°F (14°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.93 inHg
  • Observation at 4:53 am from VGT, 22 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig14
Passengers1

Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report

The docket, the folder of records gathered during an investigation (maintenance records, photographs, witness statements, examinations), has not been read from the NTSB for this case yet; the list appears here once it has. Open the docket at the NTSB.

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, the folder of records gathered during the investigation, shown as the NTSB released them (the NTSB redacts some personal details first) and listed under the NTSB's own titles. This site's own text never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number WPR13GA338.