Bell HH-1H accident near Mount Charleston, Nevada, July 23, 2013
On July 23, 2013 at about 5:20 am local time, a Bell HH-1H (helicopter), registered N233JP, was involved in an accident during maneuvering (hover) near Mount Charleston, Nevada (North Las Vegas airport). It was a public-use flight (local) under public-use (government) rules. 1 person was killed; 5 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The premature hoisting operation and the inadvertent disengagement of the hoist hook on the rescuer’s harness in dark night conditions. Contributing to the accident was a lack of direct audio communication between the rescuer and the hoist operator.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made November 2, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 23, 2013 · about 5:20 am local time · cases in 2013
- Place
- Mount Charleston, Nevada · North Las Vegas · cases near this airport · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed; 5 others were unhurt.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Bell HH-1H · all HH-1Hs on the register
- Registration
- N233JP · registry record · serial 70-2478
- Damage
- Not recorded
- Flight
- Public-use flight (local) · public-use (government) rules
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The purpose of the flight was to rescue a stranded hiker from the side of the mountain in dark night conditions. Once on scene, the pilot, copilot, hoist operator, and two rescue crewmembers briefed that one of the rescue crewmembers would be lowered down to the hiker and that he would then help the hiker into the strop harness. The rescuer was to remain attached to the hoist hook that was attached to his sit harness via a carbineer throughout the rescue operation, which was planned to take about 30 seconds. The hoist hook had three attachment points: a main hook, a secondary hook, and a utility eye; it is likely that the rescuer's sit harness was attached to the main hook and that the strop harness was attached to the utility eye. The hoist operator reported that, after the rescuer was lowered down to the hiker, he observed the rescuer helping the hiker into the strop harness. The hoist operator then told the pilot that he would be cleared to move the helicopter to the left and aft to clear the rock face as soon as he "had the load." The hoist operator added that he saw the rescuer signal to begin the hoisting operation. The hiker reported that the rescuer put him into the harness while remaining attached to the hoist hook. He stated that the rescuer was moving purposefully and that his actions appeared very deliberate. The rescuer then told him to stand up, and he heard what he thought was the sound of a carabineer unclipping. It is likely that the rescuer's carabineer inadvertently became disengaged or partly disengaged from the hoist hook at this point. As the cable started moving upward, the hiker then noticed that the rescuer began rushing his actions, likely indicating that the hoist operation had begun before the rescuer was ready. As the hook was ascending, the rescuer grabbed both of the hiker's hands and placed them on the harness just below the hoist hook, which was at the hiker's eye level, and told to the hiker to hold on. During a rescue using a strop harness, the rescuer is supposed to leave the ground first. However, the hiker reported that his feet left the ground first while the rescuer remained on the ledge. The hiker then started to rotate and move away from the rock face. While moving away from the rock face, the hiker felt the rescuer grab him around his waist and then slide down his body until the rescuer fell, which resulted in his death. The hiker was hoisted into the helicopter and was uninjured. Examination of the harness and hoist hook revealed no damage that would have precluded normal operation. The hoist's main and secondary hooks did not have self-locking safety mechanisms; this design could allow a carabineer to travel upward against the hoist hook's nonlocking safety latch and inadvertently disengage the hook. Given the hiker's statement about hearing a carbineer unclipping and the rescuer's subsequent fall, it is likely that the hoist hook inadvertently disengaged from the rescuer's harness. The helicopter was not equipped to allow direct intercommunications between the hoist operator and the rescuer. Therefore, once the rescuer departed the helicopter, the only effective communication between the hoist operator and the rescuer was hand signals. Although the hoist operator was using night vision goggles during the flight, the dark night conditions likely limited his detail vision and made it difficult to see the rescuer's hand signals. The lack of direct audio communications between the hoist operator and the rescuer prevented the rescuer from being able to report a problem after the hoist operation began and might have contributed to the hoist activation occurring before the rescuer was ready.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- External load event (Rotorcraft) during maneuvering (hover) defining event
The NTSB's findings
- cause Personnel issues › Action/decision › Action › Incorrect action sequence › Flight crew
- cause Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Equipment/furnishings › Agricultural/external load sys › Unintentional use/operation other cases naming the cabin, seats and restraints
- factor Personnel issues › Task performance › Communication (personnel) › Lack of communication › Not specified
- Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Light condition › Dark › Effect on personnel
Pilot
- Certificate: flight instructor, commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: single-engine land; instructor: helicopter; instrument: airplane; instrument: helicopter; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 2,754 hours in all; 90 in this make and model; 100 in the last 90 days; 35 in the last 30 days; 2,604 as pilot in command; 200 on instruments
- Last flight review: January 10, 2012
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: rgt
- Injury: no injuries
Co-pilot
- Certificate: commercial pilot, private
- Ratings: single-engine land; rotorcraft: helicopter
- Flight time: 1,150 hours in all; 0 in this make and model; 107 in the last 90 days; 34 in the last 30 days; 974 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: July 27, 2011
- Medical certificate: Class 2 (without waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: no injuries
Other crew
- Flight time: 0 hours in all; 0 in this make and model
- Medical certificate: None
- Seat: none
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 6,630 hours
- Last inspection: continuous airworthiness programme, December 6, 2012
- Maximum gross weight: 9,500 lb
- Seats: 15
- Landing gear: fixed
- Engine: Honneywell/Lycoming T53-L703 (turboshaft); 1,900 hours total
- Operator: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
The flight
- Departed from: VGT North Las Vegas NV at 4:50 am
- Destination: VGT North Las Vegas NV
- A second pilot was aboard
Weather at the time
- Light: night
- Wind: from 110° at 6 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 91°F (33°C), dew point 57°F (14°C)
- Altimeter: 29.93 inHg
- Observation at 4:53 am from VGT, 22 miles away
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flight crew | 1 | 4 | ||
| Passengers | 1 |
Documents from the investigation the NTSB's docket: the evidence folder behind the report
12 documents, released by the NTSB on November 10, 2015. View them here, or download them; the NTSB redacts some personal details before release, and this site shows the NTSB's own titles rather than its file names.
| # | Document | What it is | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pilot/operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 | PDF, 9 pages | View Download |
| 2 | Materials Laboratory Factual Report | PDF, 7 pages | View Download |
| 3 | Witness Statements- Wicks- Pilot | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 4 | Witness Statements- Roberts- Rescue Member | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 5 | Witness Statements- Rogan- Crew Chief/hoist Operator | PDF, 3 pages | View Download |
| 6 | Witness Statements- Layton- Hiker | PDF, 2 pages | View Download |
| 7 | Google Map of Accident Area | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 8 | Lvmpd Cirt Briefing Slides | PDF, 14 pages | View Download |
| 9 | Lvmpd Air Support Progress Report | PDF, 11 pages | View Download |
| 10 | Statement of Party Representatives to NTSB Investigation | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
| 11 | Lvmpd Photos of Rollout Demo | PDF, 18 pages | View Download |
| 12 | Page 46 of Nsar- Unintentional Disengagement | PDF, 1 page | View Download |
The same docket at the NTSB · documents without a copy here are fetched from the NTSB when you open them.
Connections how this case links to the rest of the register
- N233JP on the register today · the tail number may have moved to another aircraft since
- Bell HH-1 13 registered today · the model family and its accident history
- Bell 3,079 aircraft on the register
- Engine: Honneywell/Lycoming T53-L703 · as the NTSB recorded it
- North Las Vegas Airport · nearest airport
- Accidents and incidents in Nevada 1,294 since 1982 · 223 in the last ten years
- Nevada 4,589 aircraft registered
The whole map of how records connect · these connections as data: /graph/accident/WPR13GA338.json.
The bigger picture in Aviation Analytics: accidents over time since 1982, by model, by phase of flight and conditions, by place and on the map.
Everything on this page comes from the NTSB's public records. The narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words; the coded tables behind the report are written out in plain English, with pilots' ages, home towns and medical details left out. The documents and photographs are the NTSB's docket, shown as the NTSB released them. This site's own text does not name anyone involved, its policy at this time. A preliminary report can change; the final report usually follows one to two years later, and the page is refreshed when it does.
