The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB ERA21LA391 · Final report

Boeing E75 accident near Nicholson, Pennsylvania, September 30, 2021

On September 30, 2021 at about 5:30 pm local time, a 1943 Boeing E75, registered N1654M, was substantially damaged in an accident during enroute (cruise) near Nicholson, Pennsylvania (Pvt airport). It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

A total loss of engine power as a result of damaged internal carburetor mixture control components.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
September 30, 2021 · about 5:30 pm local time
Place
Nicholson, Pennsylvania · Pvt · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
No one was hurt; 2 people were on board or involved.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Boeing E75, built 1943 · all E75s on the register
Registration
N1654M · no longer on the register · serial 75-8300
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, while the airplane was at an altitude of 3,500 ft, the engine lost total power. He attempted to regain engine power by adjusting the throttle, mixture control, fuel valve controls, and carburetor heat; however, the engine would not restart. As the pilot set up an approach to a nearby airstrip, he determined that the airplane would not reach the runway and performed a forced landing into trees, resulting in substantial damage to the fuselage and wings. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the carburetor’s rotating mixture actuating rod was difficult to rotate, and binding occurred as the actuating rod was rotated by hand. Upon disassembly of the carburetor, the mixture control actuating rod and the metering needle, which is connected to the inner end of the rod, were found bent. No other damage to the carburetor was found. Because these components are largely or entirely internal to the carburetor, the bending of actuating rod and the metering needle was likely not a result of impact damage. The investigation was unable to determine how or when the carburetor components became bent. Although the bends in the actuating rod and metering needle would not have prevented the mixture control from operating, the bends would have changed how the mixture setting in the carburetor responded to the mixture control lever in the cockpit. If the cockpit control was moved toward the cutoff position, the metering needle might not have performed as expected and might have moved into the cutoff position before or after the cockpit control reached its expected cutoff position. Likewise, with the cockpit control in the normal fullrich position, the metering needle might have been in a position that was either more or less than full rich. Therefore, the bent components likely resulted in a mixture setting that was not expected for any given cockpit mixture control setting. The investigation could not determine whether the mixture would have been too lean (less fuel) or too rich (more fuel), either of which could have resulted in the engine not producing power. Four of the cylinders’ spark plugs had black-colored deposits on their electrodes, consistent with a rich mixture condition. Two spark plugs had gray-colored deposits, consistent with a normal mixture condition. The remaining three spark plugs were oil soaked, masking their electrode color, but these spark plugs would generally be more consistent with a rich mixture condition rather than a lean condition.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Loss of engine power (total) during enroute (cruise) defining event
  2. Off-field or emergency landing during enroute (cruise)
  3. Collision with terrain or object (not controlled flight into terrain) during approach

The NTSB's findings

  • Aircraft › Aircraft power plant › Engine fuel and control › Fuel control/carburetor › Damaged/degraded

Pilot

  • Certificate: commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; single-engine sea; instructor: airplane multi-engine; instructor: airplane single-engine; instrument: airplane
  • Flight time: 50 in this make and model
  • Medical certificate: Class 1 (without waivers/limitations)
  • Seat: rear
  • Injury: no injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 8,175 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, November 10, 2020; 13 hours since
  • Maximum gross weight: 2,635 lb
  • Seats: 2
  • Landing gear: fixed
  • Engine: Lycoming R680-13-E3B (piston); 2,341 hours total

The flight

  • Flight plan: none
  • A second pilot was aboard

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 030° at 5 knots
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Sky: overcast at 6,500 ft
  • Temperature: 61°F (16°C), dew point 45°F (7°C)
  • Altimeter: 30.13 inHg
  • Observation at 1:54 pm from AVP, 18 miles away

Weather report (METAR): METAR KAVP 301754Z 03005KT 10SM OVC065 16/07 A3013 RMK AO2 SLP200 T01610067 10172 20122 58005=

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers1

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number ERA21LA391.