Piper PA-30 accident near Sherman, Texas, July 8, 2023
On July 8, 2023 at about 2:41 pm local time, a 1969 Piper PA-30, registered N4743M, was substantially damaged in an accident during approach near Sherman, Texas. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was killed. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).
Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.
The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged
The pilot’s failure to maintain control during a forced landing following a loss of engine power. Contributing was the pilot’s failure to feather the left propeller following the loss of engine power.
Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.
What the record shows
- Date
- July 8, 2023 · about 2:41 pm local time
- Place
- Sherman, Texas · map
- Type
- Accident
- Injuries
- 1 person was killed.
- Weather
- visual conditions (good weather)
- Aircraft
- Piper PA-30, built 1969 · all PA-30s on the register
- Registration
- N4743M · registry record · serial 30-1848
- Damage
- Substantial damage
- Flight
- Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)
The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record
The multi-engine airplane was in level flight at 5,000 ft on a north heading toward the destination airport. Onboard data indicated the right engine’s fuel flow fluctuated for about 15 seconds. About 20 seconds later, the left engine fuel flow reduced to zero. The airplane made a slow descent toward the east for about 9 minutes, away from the destination airport. The airplane then turned west back toward the airport and continued a slow descent. About 10 minutes later, the airplane was less than 100 ft above ground level, with a groundspeed of about 61 knots. The airplane turned left about 40° during the last 4 seconds of recorded data and subsequently impacted a field with a nose-down attitude. The airplane sustained substantial damage to the fuselage, empennage, and both wings. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed the left engine’s fuel selector was in the off position and right engine’s fuel selector valve was in the main tank position. The right fuel selector valve was corroded, which most likely resulted in the right engine fuel flow fluctuations. It is possible that the pilot moved the left engine fuel selector from auxiliary tank to off inadvertently when he intended to move the right engine’s fuel selector from the auxiliary tank to the main tank. The left-engine propeller was not feathered at the accident site, which resulted in additional in-flight drag and a higher minimum controllable airspeed (VMC). During the attempted forced landing, the pilot failed to maintain adequate airspeed, which resulted in a loss of control and a nose-down impact with terrain. The pilot’s toxicology results indicated use of the sedating antihistamine medication diphenhydramine, and he may have experienced associated impairing effects at the time of the accident. More precise interpretation of the diphenhydramine level in cavity blood was not possible. The pilot also had used other drugs that may have had adverse side effects (yohimbine, as well as both tadalafil and tamsulosin), although there was no way to determine whether such side effects were present or significant. The investigation was not able to determine the role the pilot’s medication usage may have played in the accident sequence.
The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.
The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English
What happened, in order
- Loss of control in flight during approach defining event
- Fuel related during enroute
The NTSB's findings
- Personnel issues › Action/decision › Info processing/decision › Decision making/judgment › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Aircraft control › Pilot
- Personnel issues › Task performance › Use of equip/info › Use of equip/system › Pilot
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel selector/shutoff valve › Incorrect use/operation
- Aircraft › Aircraft systems › Fuel system › Fuel selector/shutoff valve › Fatigue/wear/corrosion
- Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › Engine out control › Not attained/maintained
- Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware › Fluids › Fuel › Fluid management
Pilot
- Certificate: private
- Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instrument: airplane
- Flight time: 540 hours in all; 376 in this make and model; 3 in the last 90 days; 0 in the last 30 days; 317 as pilot in command
- Last flight review: December 1, 2022
- Medical certificate: Class 3 (with waivers/limitations)
- Seat: left
- Injury: fatal
The aircraft
- Airframe total time: 3,641 hours
- Last inspection: annual inspection, November 3, 2022; 24 hours since
- Maximum gross weight: 3,600 lb
- Seats: 6
- Landing gear: retractable
- Engine 1: Lycoming IO-320-B1A (piston); 0 hours total
- Engine 2: Lycoming IO-320-B1A (piston); 0 hours total
The flight
- Departed from: T31 Mckinney TX at 2:02 pm
- Destination: SWI Sherman TX
- Flight plan: none
Weather at the time
- Light: daylight
- Wind: from 210° at 12 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Sky: clear
- Temperature: 82°F (28°C), dew point 73°F (23°C)
- Altimeter: 29.95 inHg
- Observation at 9:50 am from KGYI, 12 miles away
Weather report (METAR): KGYI 081450Z 21012KT 10SM CLR 28/23 A2995
Injuries
| Fatal | Serious | Minor | None | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flig | 1 |
About this page
Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN23FA284.
