The U.S. aircraft register, updated daily · Carbon Free Flight by 2050
Accidents · NTSB CEN13LA347 · Final report

Aerostar International INC RX 8 accident near Arvada, Colorado, June 8, 2013

On June 8, 2013 at about 1:15 pm local time, a Aerostar International INC RX 8 (balloon), registered N7059U, was substantially damaged in an accident during landing near Arvada, Colorado. It was a personal flight under general aviation rules (Part 91). 1 person was seriously injured; 2 others were unhurt. The weather was visual conditions (good weather).

Preview. This page is not yet listed for search engines.

The NTSB's probable cause their words, unchanged

The balloon's encounter with unforecast strong gusting wind, which resulted in a high-wind landing. Contributing to the accident was the National Weather Service's misjudgment of the timing and underestimation of the magnitude of the frontal boundary moving across the region.

Source: NTSB aviation accident database, copy made October 4, 2026. Docket and reports at the NTSB.

What the record shows

Date
June 8, 2013 · about 1:15 pm local time
Place
Arvada, Colorado · map
Type
Accident
Injuries
1 person was seriously injured; 2 others were unhurt.
Weather
visual conditions (good weather)
Aircraft
Aerostar International INC RX 8 · all RX 8s on the register
Registration
N7059U · registry record · serial RX8-3205
Damage
Substantial damage
Flight
Personal flight · general aviation rules (Part 91)

The NTSB's narrative final · quoted from the NTSB record

The pilot reported that, before the flight, he checked the weather forecast and received weather information from several sources. He and the other balloon pilots flying that day compared the weather information and agreed that the forecast weather provided suitable conditions for a safe flight that morning. However, because the wind conditions on the ground were light and erratic, they delayed taking off. The pilots continued monitoring the current and forecast weather using their wireless devices. The wind eventually calmed, and, after putting up additional pibals, they determined that the wind at altitude would take the balloons to the east-southeast and then south at 3 to 5 miles per hour. At takeoff, the wind was calm. The balloon traveled to the east-southeast and then, about 1,000 to 1,200 feet above ground level, the balloon turned toward the south. The first 30 to 40 minutes of flight were smooth, and the balloon traveled slowly to the southeast. About 40 minutes into the flight, at an altitude of 6,200 feet mean sea level, a wind gust buffeted the balloon. The pilot reported the condition to the other pilots who were flying in the area, and they responded that they were experiencing similar conditions at various altitudes. As he looked at the other balloons, the pilot noticed significant distortions in the envelopes indicative of high winds. The pilot briefed his passengers on a high-wind landing and landed in a cleared construction area. As the balloon touched down, he pulled the deflation lines, and the balloon deflated in seconds; however, the envelope concaved, and the balloon was dragged for several hundred feet until it came to rest on the side of a highway. A review of meteorological data available at the time of the preflight briefing indicated, in part, that wind from the west existed at 10 knots or less before takeoff. The National Weather Service (NWS) terminal area forecast expected easterly wind shifting to the northwest at 13 knots during the anticipated flight with wind from the north gusting to 23 knots after 1000 mountain daylight time. The NWS area forecast did not expect any high winds across Colorado. The NWS Aviation Forecast Center had no advisories current for low-level turbulence or high winds over Colorado surrounding the anticipated flight. However, shortly after takeoff, a sudden increase in windspeed occurred across the region with wind gusts from 20 to 38 knots. The NWS misjudged the timing and underestimated the magnitude of the frontal boundary moving across the region. It is likely that, if the pilot had known about the gusting wind at the time of takeoff, he may not have chosen to fly that day.

The complete narrative as the NTSB published it. The NTSB's docket holds the report as a PDF and any photographs, statements and other documents from the investigation.

The factual record from the NTSB's investigation tables, in plain English

What happened, in order

  1. Collision during takeoff/land during landing defining event

The NTSB's findings

  • cause Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Availability of related info
  • cause Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability › Performance/control parameters › (general) › Not specified
  • factor Organizational issues › Support/oversight/monitoring › (general) › (general) › Meteorological service
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Timing of related info
  • factor Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Accuracy of related info
  • Environmental issues › Conditions/weather/phenomena › Wind › High wind › Effect on operation

Pilot

  • Certificate: airline transport pilot, commercial pilot
  • Ratings: multi-engine land; single-engine land; instructor: instrument airplane; instrument: airplane; rotorcraft: balloon
  • Flight time: 495 hours in all; 495 in this make and model
  • Last flight review: September 19, 2012
  • Medical certificate: None
  • Seat: ctr
  • Injury: serious injuries

The aircraft

  • Airframe total time: 495 hours
  • Last inspection: annual inspection, April 23, 2013
  • Maximum gross weight: 1,650 lb
  • Seats: 1
  • Landing gear: fixed

The flight

  • Departed from: Gunbarrel CO at 1:05 pm
  • Destination: Arvada CO
  • Flight plan: none

Weather at the time

  • Light: daylight
  • Wind: from 030° at 16 knots, gusting 24
  • Visibility: 10 statute miles
  • Temperature: 64°F (18°C), dew point 46°F (8°C)
  • Altimeter: 29.88 inHg
  • Observation at 1:55 pm from KEIK, 13 miles away

Injuries

FatalSeriousMinorNone
Flig1
Passengers2

Other NTSB records under N7059U the same tail number, which may have belonged to a different aircraft at the time

1986-02-06CHI86IA083 · incident near Chicago, IL · minor damage · minor injuries

About this page

Everything above comes from the NTSB's public accident database: the narrative, probable cause and findings are the NTSB's own words, and the coded tables behind its report (pilot, aircraft, flight, weather, injuries, sequence of events) are written out in plain English. Pilots' ages, home towns and medical details are left out on purpose. The docket at the NTSB holds the report as a PDF and the investigation's photographs and documents. This site never names pilots, passengers or anyone else involved. A preliminary report describes what is known soon after the event and can change; the final report, with the probable cause, usually follows one to two years later and this page is refreshed when it does. Case number CEN13LA347.